- 30-dnevna garancija povrata novca
- Optimizacija performansi uz podršku veštačke inteligencije i Turbo hosting koji isporučuje brzine do 20 puta veće
- Interna podrška dostupna 24/7/365 putem telefona, live četa i tiket sistema
- Политика поврата новца у року од 30 дана
- Besplatan Domen, Besplatan SSL, Besplatan CDN
- Podrška dostupna 24/7/365 putem telefona, čata, baze znanja i bloga
Hosting.com vs Bluehost: Quick Summary
After testing everything from pricing to performance, Hosting.com came out as my top pick.
What really won me over was the control it gives, from choosing server locations to flexible setup options, powerful VPS management, and generous resource limits on every plan.
Bluehost does stand out for its automatic backups and stronger security, but overall, Hosting.com offers more value, freedom, and customization for both beginners and experienced users.
1. Prices and Plans Comparison
Hosting.com’s Super Low Intro Prices Make It Hard for Bluehost to Compete.
When I looked at the pricing for Hosting.com vs Bluehost, Hosting.com easily took the lead with jaw-dropping discounts across nearly all hosting types. I found shared hosting plans starting at just $1.99/month, while Bluehost’s cheapest starts at $2.95/month—but renews at a steeper $11.99/month.
Even Hosting.com’s Pro-level shared hosting stays under $5/month, which is impressive. Their VPS and reseller plans also offer way more resources at lower or similar price points compared to Bluehost.
While Bluehost bundles more free tools and premium branding perks (like Yoast and WP backups), Hosting.com just keeps things simpler and cheaper. If you’re price-conscious and don’t need all the fluff, Hosting.com is a better value.
2. Customer Support Comparison: Who’s Got Your Back?
Hosting.com Offers Fast, Knowledgeable, and Accessible Support Around the Clock.
Hosting.com Customer Support Experience
To thoroughly assess Hosting.com’s customer support, I initiated tests through both their ticketing system and live chat feature.
- Ticket Support
Navigating to the dashboard, I clicked on the “Help” button at the top-right corner and selected “Open Support Ticket.”
This action presented a form where I could:
- Enter a subject
- Choose a department
- Write my message
- Attach files if needed
I submitted a request inquiring about configuring the server firewall to allow only ports 22 (SSH), 80 (HTTP), and 443 (HTTPS), and block all others. This was sent at 8:40 PM. The response arrived 26 hours later, which is less than ideal for a security-related query.
The reply was courteous, explaining that due to the unmanaged nature of the service, direct assistance was limited. However, they offered to share general steps or help if I encountered issues following my own guide.
- Live Chat
Seeking a more immediate response, I utilized the live chat feature by clicking the chat icon in the bottom-right corner of the dashboard and selecting “Start Conversation.”
The system requested:
- Support PIN (if available)
- Department
- Message
I asked whether installing WordPress through cPanel using Softaculous would automatically set up the database and configure optimal PHP settings like memory limit and max execution time, or if manual adjustments were necessary.
A bot promptly acknowledged my message, stating: “Please bear with us while we connect you with the next available agent.”
Within about a minute, an agent named Meghana joined the chat and confirmed that everything would be configured automatically with Softaculous, negating the need for manual tweaks.
The entire exchange was concise and completed in under 3 minutes, providing clear and helpful information without unnecessary back-and-forth.
Bluehost Customer Support Experience
To evaluate Bluehost’s customer support, I initiated a live chat session via their website. Clicking the chat icon at the bottom-right corner, a chatbot guided me through initial steps, including selecting the purpose of my inquiry (I chose shared hosting for a personal site) and entering my name.
I was then informed that I would be connected to someone who could assist me. Within a minute, a live agent joined the chat.
I inquired about migrating an existing WooCommerce-based WordPress site to Bluehost, specifically seeking information on the process, how to avoid downtime, and whether they offered any free tools or support for that.
The agent responded promptly and helpfully, explaining that Bluehost offers a free DIY migration tool, along with a paid professional migration service for users who prefer not to handle it themselves. They also provided a link to a detailed step-by-step guide for using the free migration tool.
The entire interaction was smooth and took less than 10 minutes. I appreciated the quick connection to a real person and the clear explanation of options without any pressure to purchase additional services.
3. Hosting Features Comparison
Hosting.com Offers More Powerful Features for WordPress and Developer Flexibility.
Hosting.com Features
After signing up with Hosting.com, I was impressed by how much value they packed into even the lowest-tier plans. Their AI-powered WordPress builder, Extendify, made it incredibly easy to launch a personalized website in under a minute, with smart content suggestions, image generation, and layout templates that adapt to your needs.
But you’re not locked into just one builder. If you don’t want to pay for Extendify, you still have access to Softaculous and Sitejet Builder through cPanel. Softaculous lets you install over 400 web apps—including WordPress, Joomla, and Magento—with just a click. Sitejet Builder, on the other hand, offers a visual drag-and-drop interface perfect for quickly launching a modern, responsive website, without needing any design skills.
Storage starts at 20GB and scales up to 160GB on SSD, and while bandwidth isn’t explicitly labeled “unlimited,” I didn’t face any limits during regular traffic. I also liked the included LiteSpeed caching, Monster Insights, and AIOSEO plugins that came pre-installed.
The control panel felt snappier than the standard cPanel, and you can still switch to cPanel if that’s your preference.
However, backups need to be handled manually unless you add a plugin, which is a slight downside. Still, I found their free site migration and 24/7 support reliable when moving over a WordPress site.
Bluehost Features
Bluehost does a great job with user-friendly hosting that scales well, especially for beginners and small businesses. Their WonderSuite AI builder and managed WordPress setup simplify things like installing themes, setting up plugins, and writing content.
Their Choice Plus and Online Store plans offer support for up to 50 websites and include 50GB NVMe SSD storage, free daily backups for the first year, and free CDN via Cloudflare. You also get a solid range of email marketing tools like Creative Mail and SEO support via Yoast SEO.
Still, the email features require a separate subscription after the trial period, and you’re encouraged to upgrade sooner to access features like domain privacy and staging environments.
4. Website Performance Comparison
Bluehost Delivers Slightly Faster Performance.
How I Tested Hosting Speed for This Review
To really see how these two providers stack up in real-world performance, I ran both of their websites through GTmetrix.
I picked servers located in London, UK, to level the playing field, and I used Chrome (version 125) for consistency. I tested a site I deployed on Hosting.com and compared it to one hosted on Bluehost.
Hosting.com GTmetrix Results
The structure score was impressive, and the LCP was fast. But the backend response time (452ms) and TTFB (716ms) suggest that while Hosting.com is well optimized, it may not be as quick in handling requests during high load.
Still, it’s fast enough for most users, and if you’re managing caching or using a CDN, the difference would likely be negligible.
Bluehost GTmetrix Results
While the performance grade was just a touch higher than Hosting.com, where Bluehost really pulled ahead was in the Total Blocking Time and backend response. With a TBT of just 6ms and a faster TTFB, Bluehost’s infrastructure felt just a bit snappier.
Even though both providers clocked the same LCP, Bluehost hit “fully loaded” status quicker and was interactive faster. There were small differences, but they added up in the real user experience.
5. Ease of Use Comparison: Which Platform Is Easier to Use?
Hosting.com Wins for Its Developer-Friendly Tools and Smooth Dashboard Experience.
I wanted to see how easy each platform made it to get started, launch a website, and manage a hosting environment day-to-day, especially from a beginner’s perspective.
So I walked through every key step: registration, exploring the dashboard, setting up WordPress, and managing the VPS server. Here’s what I found.
Registration and Creating a New Account
Hosting.com
To see how easy it is to sign up, I started with Hosting.com. From the homepage, I hovered over the Hosting tab and picked VPS Hosting under the “Servers” section.
I landed on a clean comparison page, and after checking out the options, I chose the VPS M plan. Clicking Buy Now led me to the configuration screen.
Here’s where Hosting.com impressed me early on. I could customize everything:
- Billing Term – I chose a 1-year plan and saw my total update in real time with the 52% discount.
- Operating System – I picked AlmaLinux since it’s compatible with cPanel.
- Add-ons – cPanel was optional, as were upgrades like extra RAM, storage, and Imunify360.
- Server Location – I went with Dallas, US, but other regions like Frankfurt, London, and Sydney were just as easy to select.
On the right side of the screen, a real-time summary updated with every change. This helped me stay confident about what I was ordering. After reviewing everything, I clicked Confirm and Proceed, entered my personal details, selected PayPal, and placed the order.
Honestly? The process was fast, transparent, and very beginner-friendly, without dumbing things down.
Bluehost
Then I tested Bluehost. It was also very straightforward, but with a more “guided” feel. From the homepage, I chose Shared Hosting and picked the Choice Plus plan. Bluehost prompted me to claim a free domain (with extensions like .com, .net, .biz), but I could also proceed without one.
Then I was taken to the cart page, where Bluehost suggested several upsells—extra security, SEO tools, SiteLock, and more. This part felt a bit busy compared to Hosting.com, but it was easy enough to skip through.
After reviewing the plan and final total, I clicked Continue to Checkout, filled in my personal details, created an account, and completed the payment using PayPal.
Bluehost’s process was quick and polished. It leaned more into handholding, which is great for total beginners, but I preferred Hosting.com’s transparency and customization.
User Interface – Client Area & Dashboard
Next, I wanted to see how intuitive and responsive the dashboards were, because that’s where you’ll spend most of your time.
Hosting.com
I logged into Hosting.com first. The interface felt clean and modern. What I liked most was how the portal didn’t reload every time I clicked a menu item. Instead, the content updated dynamically on the right panel. It felt fast and distraction-free.
The left-side menu had all the key sections: Place New Order, Products & Services, and Billing. On the right, my services were listed with clear statuses, domains, and renewal dates. Even if you’re juggling multiple services, there’s filtering and sorting to keep everything tidy.
Everything was labeled in plain English, and I didn’t have to dig around for anything. Hosting.com made it easy to get oriented, manage my hosting, and view billing all in one place.
Bluehost
Then I tested the Bluehost dashboard. Right away, I got a warm welcome message and some helpful prompts like “Pick up where you left off.” It felt personal, which I appreciated.
The left-hand menu included tabs like Domains, Google Workspace, Hosting, and Security. Clicking any of these updated the right panel instantly. Similar to Hosting.com, there were no page reloads.
It’s clear Bluehost is designed with beginners in mind. Everything was laid out visually, with big icons and tips to guide you through setup and management. It felt more like an app than a dashboard—and that’s a good thing if you’re not used to hosting interfaces.
Creating a New WordPress Website
I wanted to see how quickly I could go from account creation to launching a live site.
Hosting.com
Starting with Hosting.com, I clicked Manage next to my VPS hosting plan. On the product page, there was a bold Login to Control Panel button—one click and I was inside cPanel, no extra passwords needed.
Inside cPanel, I opened Softaculous, clicked Install WordPress, chose my domain, filled in the admin info, and clicked Install. The whole process took less than 5 minutes.
Everything was smooth. There were no confusing steps, and Softaculous even provided a link to log into my new site right away.
Bluehost
Then I tried the same on Bluehost. From the Hosting tab in the dashboard, I clicked Add Site, then chose Install WordPress.
Bluehost walked me through a few screens to enter the site name, domain (or a temporary domain), and admin info.
Installation took a few minutes. Once done, I could access the WordPress dashboard directly from Bluehost’s panel. It was just as easy as Hosting.com, but more “locked down”—you follow Bluehost’s sequence with fewer customization options.
Server Management Dashboard
Finally, I wanted to explore how well each provider handles VPS server management. This is where the real differences showed up.
Hosting.com
With Hosting.com, I opened my VPS management page by clicking “Manage” next to my server name.
At the top was a “Manage Your Product” section with all the quick actions:
- Reboot
- Power Off
- Reinstall Server
- Launch Console
- Attach Recovery ISO
Below that, I had access to tabs like Overview, Billing, Settings, and a secure Product Secrets vault where I could store my SSH credentials and root passwords encrypted with AES-256. Hosting.com gave me complete control, without feeling overwhelming.
You can even reinstall your OS in one click, change server names, and get console access through the browser. This kind of power is rare at this price point, especially with such a clean interface.
Bluehost
In contrast, Bluehost uses cPanel for server management, even on VPS. From the main dashboard, I had to scroll to the cPanel button in Quick Links to access deeper tools.
Once inside, it’s the familiar cPanel environment where I could manage domains, email, databases, and so on.
For basic use, Bluehost works great. But when it comes to raw control—like attaching ISOs, managing recovery modes, or accessing root settings—Hosting.com is ahead. Bluehost’s VPS is managed, so it doesn’t offer the same flexibility for developers or advanced users.
6. Privacy and Security Comparison: Which Platform is More Secure?
Your Data Is Safer in the Hands of Bluehost.
Hosting.com Privacy and Security
Once I got my site up and running with Hosting.com, I wanted to take a close look at what kind of security features were built in, especially for someone managing multiple client projects or running a business site.
The first thing I confirmed was that every plan includes a free SSL certificate, so your site is encrypted out of the box—no need to configure anything manually. On the network side, Hosting.com uses Cloudflare CDN integration, which is a huge plus.
It doesn’t just optimize site speed. It also acts as a buffer against malicious traffic and DDoS attacks. I liked knowing that data routing happens through Cloudflare’s secure, globally distributed network.
I also found that basic malware scanning is available, and it’s included by default. However, when I went to look for daily backup options, there wasn’t a built-in tool available at the Hosting.com level. You’d need to set this up manually within cPanel or use a plugin if you’re running WordPress, which can be a limitation for users expecting automatic backups as part of the plan.
Hosting.com also lacks a Web Application Firewall (WAF) and a secure access manager. That means no centralized control for managing admin logins or permissions, and no native system to protect web applications from common threats like SQL injection or cross-site scripting. VPS users do get root access and a secure secrets vault for credentials, but this still doesn’t replace full access controls or advanced application-layer protections.
Bluehost Privacy and Security
After setting up my Bluehost site, I explored the security tools available, and I was honestly impressed by the range of protection that’s already built into their platform.
Just like Hosting.com, SSL and DDoS protection come standard, and they also integrate Cloudflare for both speed and security. But Bluehost doesn’t stop at the basics.
They provide automatic daily backups, which gave me peace of mind knowing I wouldn’t lose any site changes or updates. It’s all managed on their end, so you don’t have to enable or configure anything unless you want more control manually.
Next, I looked into malware protection, and it’s covered out of the box. But what stood out to me were the additional layers that Hosting.com doesn’t offer:
- A built-in Web Application Firewall (WAF) that protects your site from bad traffic
- A Secure Access Manager to control user roles and protect against unauthorized access
- 2FA integration, file monitoring, and password-protected directories
- SiteLock (optional), for more advanced malware removal and auditing
The overall feel is that Bluehost has built its platform with security-first thinking, especially for users who want protection without needing to tinker with settings.
7. Server Locations Comparison
Hosting.com wins thanks to its wider choice of server locations and the flexibility to choose your server region during setup.
Hosting.com Server Locations
When I signed up with Hosting.com, one of the things I was really looking forward to checking out was how much control I had over the server location. This is a big deal for performance, especially if your audience is concentrated in a specific region.
During the checkout process, I was impressed to see that Hosting.com let me choose from over 20+ global data centers, right from the get-go.
I had the option to host my server in:
- Dallas, US
- Toronto, Canada
- Mexico City, Mexico
- London, UK
- Frankfurt, Germany
- Sydney, Australia
- Singapore
- Mumbai, India
I personally picked Dallas for this test, but if I were building a site targeting a European audience, I could’ve just as easily chosen Frankfurt or London.
That flexibility really stood out.
Later, I also wanted to know what would happen if I changed my mind or needed to move my server to a different location. So I reached out to Hosting.com’s support. They told me that you can change your server’s location, but the process involves spinning up a brand-new server in the new region and manually migrating your data.
Since this was an unmanaged VPS, the migration is entirely up to you. No automatic transfer tools or assisted migrations are provided.
It’s not as seamless as I’d hoped, but at least the option exists—you’re not locked in forever to one region.
Bluehost Server Locations
Next, I reviewed Bluehost’s setup. Bluehost also has a solid global infrastructure, with multiple data centers located in:
- Provo, Utah (Primary US center)
- Orem, Utah (Secondary US)
- Mumbai, India
- London, UK
- Shanghai and Hong Kong (China)
- (Unofficial presence reported in Toronto and Amsterdam)
However, when I went through Bluehost’s signup process, I wasn’t given any option to choose my server’s location. Everything was automatically assigned based on internal optimization rules.
If you’re using Bluehost.com, you’ll most likely be placed in a US-based data center. If you register through Bluehost.in, you might get hosted on Indian servers—but this isn’t guaranteed, and there’s no way to manually select or confirm your location during registration.
Later on, I also tried to find out if there was a way to change the server location after signing up. Unfortunately, Bluehost doesn’t allow server location changes at all. The only workaround would be to cancel your account and start a new one using a different regional Bluehost site—hardly a practical solution.
To make up for this, Bluehost offers free CDN services, which help optimize global performance by caching content across various edge locations. Still, it’s not the same as having a server near your audience from day one.
Hosting.com vs Bluehost: The Bottom Line
After testing both providers hands-on, Hosting.com came out on top. It delivers unbeatable value for money, developer-friendly tools, and more flexibility with server locations.
While Bluehost slightly edged ahead in performance and security, Hosting.com gave me more control, customization, and savings, especially if you’re running multiple sites or managing client projects.
| Category | Winner | Why |
| Pricing and Plans | Hosting.com | Significantly lower intro prices and better VPS value |
| Support | Hosting.com | Faster live chat responses and more direct answers |
| Hosting Features | Hosting.com | More flexibility, tools like Sitejet, Softaculous, and full cPanel access |
| Website Performance | Bluehost | Slightly faster TTFB and load times in GTmetrix tests |
| Ease of Use | Hosting.com | Transparent setup, better server control, and smoother dashboard |
| Privacy and Security | Bluehost | More built-in tools like WAF, 2FA, and daily backups |
| Server Locations | Hosting.com | Lets you pick your region; more global coverage and flexibility |
